Nallakumarasamy A, Sivakumar S, Vetrivel VN, Balaji VP, Stephen N, Jeyaraman N, Jeyaraman M. Os subepicondylare mediale ossicle as a cause for cubital tunnel syndrome: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(16): 120594 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i16.120594]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The World Journal of Clinical Cases has ensured the fast and early publication of the case report “Os subepicondylare mediale ossicle – cause for cubital tunnel syndrome.” This timely dissemination underscores the journal’s commitment to advancing clinical knowledge by highlighting rare anatomical variations with significant surgical implications. Rapid publication not only accelerates awareness among clinicians but also fosters early integration of novel insights into patient care. By prioritizing such unique case reports, the journal strengthens academic dialogue, supports evidence-based surgical decision-making, and enhances global access to clinically relevant findings that may otherwise remain underrecognized in orthopaedic practice.